 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
 |
 |
||||||||||||
 |
 |
 |
|
||||||||||
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
 |
|
|
CHAPTER 7 RELATING COLLECTION AND PROCESSING ISSUES Since many generators of recyclables have older, more established programs, they may have a fixed method of collection. Generators should, however, review their existing collection methods and be flexible in considering changes to the collection program. Processors and end markets may be able to provide significantly better prices for a commodity if the generator changes the collection method. As an example, a local government may be collecting mixed paper. The price differential between mixed paper and newspaper may be significant, but it may be cost prohibitive for the processor to separate the newspaper from mixed paper. What would be the cost (both in terms of collection and additional public education) to correct the newspaper separately? What would be the value of the remaining mixed paper after the generator separates the newspaper? Another example would be a community with a bag program for containers. What would be the cost of collecting and processing the material loose (eliminating the need for bag breaking)? How would the change affect processing and quality of the material? What would be the cost of additional public education? Again, the key is the flexibility to be able to adjust to changing market conditions. back to top |
|